Top 10 Asian Spin Bowlers In T20Is In Asia

Kindly switch to Landscape Mode for better viewing experience

Our T20 International (T20I) ratings take into account all matches from the first T20I match on February 17, 2005 till the below mentioned last update date. Brief explanation of the ratings is given before each section (Detailed Explanation). So, here are the Top 10 Asian Spin bowlers in matches In Asia in T20Is.

*Note: All T20I Ratings are updated till 2025-10-12

FC RATING

Points to note about ASIANS IN ASIA Rating:-

  • Unfavourable Conditions (UC) is Outside Asia for Spinnrs and In Asia for Pacers.
  • Favourable Conditions (FC) are the opposite.
  • This categorization has been done as there are more points for UC in our Overall Rating.

THE CRITERIA


The ASIANS IN ASIA Rating is divided into 5 main sections:-

CRITERIA STAT POINTS
Prolific Wickets Taken 200.00
Consistent Average 250.00
Economic Strike Rate 300.00
Best Bowling Top Inns (Wkts) 100.00
Economic Bowling Top Inns (Eco) 150.00
The Trend Setter (TS)

TS is the player which does the best in a criteria. The rating of all other players are calculated taking the TS as the benchmark. Know All About TS. Here is an example:-

  • TS Ave: 25.00; Player X Ave: 30.00; Section Points: 300.00
  • TS Points: 300.00(Max); Player X Points: TS Ave/Ave X 300 = 25.00/30.00 X 300 = 250.00
  • Ratings of all sections are calculated similarly with Ave being replaced by the Criteria Stat.
TT and NWT

Some sections consider performances only against the top teams (TT) and non weak teams (NWT). Here is some information:-

  • Win/Loss Ratio is used to determine TT and NWT.
  • They are calculated by decades.
  • A bowler's performace is counted in TT or NWT if it comes against that team in the specific decade.
  • Knock Out matches of T20 World Cup are also counted in TT.
  • TT & NWT may be found in the last section.

QUALIFICATION


Min Innings (TT) 15
Min Career Wkts 25

PROLIFIC


Criteria: Points For Wickets Taken

RANK BOWLER NAT FP LP MP INNS WKTS RAT
TS Rashid Khan AFG 2015 2025 2020 76 132 200.00
1 Rashid Khan AFG 2015 2025 2020 76 132 200.00
2 Shakib Al Hasan BAN 2006 2024 2015 76 99 150.00
3 W Hasaranga SL 2019 2025 2022 56 95 143.94
4 YS Chahal IND 2016 2023 2019.5 49 65 98.48
5 R Ashwin IND 2010 2022 2016 41 51 77.27
6 Mujeeb Zadran AFG 2018 2025 2021.5 41 49 74.24
7 Saeed Ajmal PAK 2009 2015 2012 35 47 71.21
8 Imad Wasim PAK 2015 2024 2019.5 43 44 66.67
9 Kuldeep Yadav IND 2017 2025 2021 25 42 63.64
10 Nasum Ahmed BAN 2021 2025 2023 33 39 59.09

CONSISTENT


R Ave

Relative Average (R Ave) is a more accurate type of average. Know How It Is Calculated. Briefly it takes into account:-

  • Strength of Opposition.
  • Venues at which a bowler has played.
  • Time Period in which he has been active

Criteria: Points For R Ave

Min Qualification For TS
Min Wickets 25
Min Wickets (TT) 15

Against All Teams

RANK BOWLER INNS RUNS WKTS AVE R AVE RAT
TS Rashid Khan 76 1730 132 13.11 15.54 100.00
1 Rashid Khan 76 1730 132 13.11 15.54 100.00
2 W Hasaranga 56 1458 95 15.35 15.86 98.00
3 Kuldeep Yadav 25 622 42 14.81 16.06 96.75
4 Saeed Ajmal 35 833 47 17.72 18.93 82.09
5 R Ashwin 41 963 51 18.88 19.40 80.11
6 Nasum Ahmed 33 699 39 17.92 20.34 76.41
7 Imad Wasim 43 870 44 19.77 20.83 74.63
8 Shakib Al Hasan 76 1843 99 18.62 21.26 73.10
9 YS Chahal 49 1433 65 22.05 22.70 68.47
10 Mujeeb Zadran 41 1001 49 20.43 22.82 68.10

Against Top Teams

RANK BOWLER INNS RUNS WKTS AVE R AVE RAT
TS Kuldeep Yadav 17 424 31 13.68 14.82 150.00
1 Kuldeep Yadav 17 424 31 13.68 14.82 150.00
2 W Hasaranga 43 1177 76 15.49 15.20 146.26
3 Saeed Ajmal 31 737 45 16.38 17.23 129.02
4 Nasum Ahmed 17 327 21 15.57 17.61 126.24
5 Imad Wasim 31 637 34 18.74 19.84 112.04
6 Mujeeb Zadran 19 397 20 19.85 20.12 110.48
7 Rashid Khan 27 697 36 19.36 20.31 109.44
8 R Ashwin 31 749 35 21.40 21.08 105.46
9 YS Chahal 34 1052 47 22.38 22.66 98.11
10 Shakib Al Hasan 43 1088 45 24.18 26.07 85.29

ECONOMIC


R ER

Relative Economy Rate (R ER) for bowlers is calculated using the same method as R Ave with average being replaced with ER.

Criteria: Points For R ER

Min Qualification For TS
Min Balls 400

Against All Teams

RANK BOWLER INNS BLS RUNS ER R ER RAT
TS Saeed Ajmal 35 817 833 6.12 6.16 100.00
1 Saeed Ajmal 35 817 833 6.12 6.16 100.00
2 Imad Wasim 43 864 870 6.04 6.26 98.39
3 Rashid Khan 76 1760 1730 5.90 6.28 98.18
4 R Ashwin 41 912 963 6.34 6.56 93.98
5 Nasum Ahmed 33 651 699 6.44 6.67 92.44
6 Mujeeb Zadran 41 928 1001 6.47 6.71 91.79
7 Kuldeep Yadav 25 529 622 7.05 6.78 90.94
8 W Hasaranga 56 1276 1458 6.86 6.83 90.16
9 Shakib Al Hasan 76 1686 1843 6.56 6.84 90.06
10 YS Chahal 49 1080 1433 7.96 7.57 81.37

Against Top Teams

RANK BOWLER INNS BLS RUNS ER R ER RAT
TS Mujeeb Zadran 19 414 397 5.75 5.80 200.00
1 Mujeeb Zadran 19 414 397 5.75 5.80 200.00
2 Saeed Ajmal 31 731 737 6.05 6.02 192.66
3 Imad Wasim 31 630 637 6.07 6.27 184.93
4 Kuldeep Yadav 17 372 424 6.84 6.34 182.94
5 Nasum Ahmed 17 324 327 6.06 6.35 182.54
6 Rashid Khan 27 648 697 6.45 6.66 174.13
7 R Ashwin 31 678 749 6.63 6.76 171.38
8 Shakib Al Hasan 43 957 1088 6.82 7.04 164.79
9 W Hasaranga 43 976 1177 7.24 7.05 164.40
10 YS Chahal 34 750 1052 8.42 7.74 149.77

BEST BOWLING BY WKTS (NWT)


BBW

In this criteria, we have taken the top 5 bowling performances by Wkts of a bowler against Non Weak Teams. Best Bowling By Wickets (BBW) is simply the total wickets taken in the 5 innings divided by 5.

Criteria: Points For Wkts Taken In Top 5 Inns

RANK BOWLER 1 2 3 4 5 BBW RAT
TS YS Chahal 6/25 4/23 4/52 3/18 3/20 4.00 100.00
1 YS Chahal 6/25 4/23 4/52 3/18 3/20 4.00 100.00
2 Shakib Al Hasan 5/21 4/9 3/8 3/24 3/27 3.60 90.00
2 W Hasaranga 4/9 4/17 4/33 3/20 3/21 3.60 90.00
4 Saeed Ajmal 4/23 4/30 3/17 3/18 3/25 3.40 85.00
4 R Ashwin 4/8 4/11 3/14 3/22 3/24 3.40 85.00
4 Rashid Khan 4/12 4/18 3/13 3/22 3/38 3.40 85.00
7 Imad Wasim 5/14 3/19 3/20 3/21 2/2 3.20 80.00
7 Kuldeep Yadav 4/30 3/13 3/18 3/18 3/52 3.20 80.00
7 Nasum Ahmed 4/10 4/10 4/19 2/5 2/8 3.20 80.00
10 Mujeeb Zadran 4/15 3/16 2/9 2/21 2/24 2.60 65.00

BEST BOWLING BY ECO (NWT)


BBE

In this criteria, we have taken the top 5 bowling performances by Economy of a bowler against Non Weak Teams. Best Bowling By Economy (BBE) is the Relative Economy of the bowler in the 5 Inns. Only 12+ Balls performaces are counted in this criteria.

Criteria: Points For Economy In Top 5 Inns

RANK BOWLER 1 2 3 4 5 BBE RAT
TS Nasum Ahmed 2.0/5 4.0/10 4.0/10 4.0/11 4.0/15 2.93 150.00
1 Nasum Ahmed 2.0/5 4.0/10 4.0/10 4.0/11 4.0/15 2.93 150.00
2 R Ashwin 4.0/8 4.0/8 3.2/11 4.0/14 4.0/14 2.94 149.36
3 Shakib Al Hasan 3.4/9 4.0/10 3.1/8 4.0/13 2.0/8 2.97 147.83
4 Mujeeb Zadran 4.0/9 3.0/9 4.0/12 3.0/10 4.0/14 3.11 141.31
5 Rashid Khan 4.0/12 4.0/12 4.0/13 4.0/15 4.0/15 3.56 123.35
6 Imad Wasim 4.0/8 4.0/11 4.0/14 4.0/18 4.0/18 3.58 122.96
7 YS Chahal 2.0/4 3.0/11 2.0/8 4.0/18 4.0/19 3.80 115.58
8 Saeed Ajmal 4.0/12 4.0/13 4.0/17 4.0/18 4.0/18 3.93 111.94
9 W Hasaranga 4.0/9 3.0/12 4.0/17 4.0/18 4.0/19 3.93 111.75
10 Kuldeep Yadav 4.0/13 4.0/16 4.0/17 4.0/18 4.0/18 3.94 111.67

ASIANS IN ASIA RATING


The ASIANS IN ASIA (FC) Rating is the addition of the points of all the above criteria. The rating is out of 1,000.

RANK BOWLER PRO CON ECO BBW BBE FC RAT
1 Rashid Khan 200.00 209.44 272.31 85.00 123.35 890.09
2 W Hasaranga 143.94 244.27 254.56 90.00 111.75 844.52
3 Shakib Al Hasan 150.00 158.38 254.85 90.00 147.83 801.06
4 Kuldeep Yadav 63.64 246.75 273.88 80.00 111.67 775.93
5 Saeed Ajmal 71.21 211.11 292.66 85.00 111.94 771.93
6 Nasum Ahmed 59.09 202.64 274.98 80.00 150.00 766.72
7 R Ashwin 77.27 185.57 265.36 85.00 149.36 762.56
8 Mujeeb Zadran 74.24 178.57 291.79 65.00 141.31 750.91
9 Imad Wasim 66.67 186.67 283.33 80.00 122.96 739.62
10 YS Chahal 98.48 166.58 231.15 100.00 115.58 711.79

TOP TEAMS


DECADE OF MAT 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
2000s PAK SA SL IND WI AUS NZ ENG
2010s IND SA PAK AUS ENG NZ SL WI
2020s IND AUS ENG NZ PAK SA BAN WI

NON WEAK TEAMS


DECADE OF MAT 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
2000s PAK SA SL IND WI AUS NZ ENG BAN
2010s IND SA PAK AUS ENG NZ SL WI BAN AFG
2020s IND AUS ENG NZ PAK SA BAN WI SL US AFG

*Most of our ratings are dynamic, and as new matches are played, the rating of earlier bowlers may change if current bowlers set new benchmarks.



Leave a Comment