Top 10 Non-Asian Fast Bowlers In T20Is In Asia

Kindly switch to Landscape Mode for better viewing experience

Our T20 International (T20I) ratings take into account all matches from the first T20I match on February 17, 2005 till the below mentioned last update date. Brief explanation of the ratings is given before each section (Detailed Explanation). So, here are the Top 10 Non Asian Fast bowlers in matches In Asia in T20Is.

*Note: All T20I Ratings are updated till 2026-03-08

UC RATING

Points to note about NON ASIANS IN ASIA Rating:-

  • Unfavourable Conditions (UC) is Outside Asia for Spinnrs and In Asia for Pacers.
  • Favourable Conditions (FC) are the opposite.
  • This categorization has been done as there are more points for UC in our Overall Rating.

THE CRITERIA


The NON ASIANS IN ASIA Rating is divided into 5 main sections:-

CRITERIA STAT POINTS
Prolific Wickets Taken 250.00
Consistent Average 200.00
Economic Strike Rate 250.00
Best Bowling Top Inns (Wkts) 150.00
Economic Bowling Top Inns (Eco) 150.00
The Trend Setter (TS)

TS is the player which does the best in a criteria. The rating of all other players are calculated taking the TS as the benchmark. Know All About TS. Here is an example:-

  • TS Ave: 25.00; Player X Ave: 30.00; Section Points: 300.00
  • TS Points: 300.00(Max); Player X Points: TS Ave/Ave X 300 = 25.00/30.00 X 300 = 250.00
  • Ratings of all sections are calculated similarly with Ave being replaced by the Criteria Stat.
TT and NWT

Some sections consider performances only against the top teams (TT) and non weak teams (NWT). Here is some information:-

  • Win/Loss Ratio is used to determine TT and NWT.
  • They are calculated by decades.
  • A bowler's performace is counted in TT or NWT if it comes against that team in the specific decade.
  • Knock Out matches of T20 World Cup are also counted in TT.
  • TT & NWT may be found in the last section.

QUALIFICATION


Min Innings (TT) 10
Min Career Wkts 25

PROLIFIC


Criteria: Points For Wickets Taken

RANK BOWLER NAT FP LP MP INNS WKTS RAT
TS TG Southee NZ 2008 2024 2016 30 42 250.00
1 TG Southee NZ 2008 2024 2016 30 42 250.00
2 MA Starc AUS 2012 2024 2018 25 39 232.14
3 B Muzarabani ZIM 2018 2026 2022 22 38 226.19
4 K Rabada SA 2014 2026 2020 31 32 190.48
5 JC Archer ENG 2019 2026 2022.5 23 30 178.57
6 JR Hazlewood AUS 2013 2025 2019 19 29 172.62
7 TA Boult NZ 2013 2024 2018.5 15 26 154.76
7 LT Ngidi SA 2017 2026 2021.5 19 26 154.76
9 D Pretorius SA 2017 2022 2019.5 17 24 142.86
10 DW Steyn SA 2007 2020 2013.5 14 21 125.00

CONSISTENT


R Ave

Relative Average (R Ave) is a more accurate type of average. Know How It Is Calculated. Briefly it takes into account:-

  • Strength of Opposition.
  • Venues at which a bowler has played.
  • Time Period in which he has been active

Criteria: Points For R Ave

Min Qualification For TS
Min Wickets 25
Min Wickets (TT) 15

Against All Teams

RANK BOWLER INNS RUNS WKTS AVE R AVE RAT
TS TA Boult 15 412 26 15.85 15.25 100.00
1 TA Boult 15 412 26 15.85 15.25 100.00
2 D Pretorius 17 410 24 17.08 16.25 93.88
3 DW Steyn 14 338 21 16.10 17.27 88.32
4 JR Hazlewood 19 480 29 16.55 17.46 87.34
5 LT Ngidi 19 519 26 19.96 18.02 84.67
6 B Muzarabani 22 668 38 17.58 19.73 77.31
7 TG Southee 30 848 42 20.19 20.30 75.12
8 MA Starc 25 749 39 19.21 20.50 74.39
9 JC Archer 23 784 30 26.13 25.64 59.49
10 K Rabada 31 918 32 28.69 26.89 56.73

Against Top Teams

RANK BOWLER INNS RUNS WKTS AVE R AVE RAT
TS TA Boult 11 321 18 17.83 15.94 100.00
1 TA Boult 11 321 18 17.83 15.94 100.00
2 D Pretorius 14 353 20 17.65 16.19 98.41
3 B Muzarabani 12 322 19 16.95 17.71 89.98
4 JR Hazlewood 15 397 23 17.26 17.73 89.87
5 DW Steyn 12 310 18 17.22 18.05 88.28
6 LT Ngidi 15 410 17 24.12 20.53 77.61
7 MA Starc 21 651 31 21.00 22.17 71.89
8 K Rabada 22 640 24 26.67 23.14 68.87
9 TG Southee 22 650 25 26.00 25.09 63.52
10 JC Archer 17 599 21 28.52 26.38 60.41

ECONOMIC


R ER

Relative Economy Rate (R ER) for bowlers is calculated using the same method as R Ave with average being replaced with ER.

Criteria: Points For R ER

Min Qualification For TS
Min Balls 200

Against All Teams

RANK BOWLER INNS BLS RUNS ER R ER RAT
TS JR Hazlewood 19 412 480 6.99 6.99 100.00
1 JR Hazlewood 19 412 480 6.99 6.99 100.00
2 TA Boult 15 346 412 7.14 7.05 99.12
3 DW Steyn 14 301 338 6.74 7.15 97.84
4 TG Southee 30 693 848 7.34 7.39 94.68
5 LT Ngidi 19 388 519 8.03 7.43 94.08
6 D Pretorius 17 307 410 8.01 7.61 91.87
7 K Rabada 31 674 918 8.17 7.86 88.97
8 MA Starc 25 583 749 7.71 7.97 87.79
9 B Muzarabani 22 498 668 8.05 8.25 84.74
10 JC Archer 23 528 784 8.91 8.30 84.29

Against Top Teams

RANK BOWLER INNS BLS RUNS ER R ER RAT
TS AA Nortje 13 266 348 7.85 7.15 150.00
1 B Muzarabani 12 270 322 7.16 7.17 149.68
2 K Rabada 22 496 640 7.74 7.25 148.03
3 TA Boult 11 250 321 7.70 7.27 147.60
4 LT Ngidi 15 292 410 8.42 7.55 142.04
5 JR Hazlewood 15 316 397 7.54 7.55 142.03
6 DW Steyn 12 253 310 7.35 7.63 140.54
7 TG Southee 22 503 650 7.75 7.66 140.01
8 D Pretorius 14 259 353 8.18 7.68 139.68
9 JC Archer 17 396 599 9.08 8.27 129.68
10 MA Starc 21 487 651 8.02 8.29 129.34

BEST BOWLING BY WKTS (NWT)


BBW

In this criteria, we have taken the top 5 bowling performances by Wkts of a bowler against Non Weak Teams. Best Bowling By Wickets (BBW) is simply the total wickets taken in the 5 innings divided by 5.

Criteria: Points For Wkts Taken In Top 5 Inns

RANK BOWLER 1 2 3 4 5 BBW RAT
TS JR Hazlewood 4/16 4/39 3/16 3/24 2/8 3.20 150.00
1 JR Hazlewood 4/16 4/39 3/16 3/24 2/8 3.20 150.00
1 D Pretorius 5/17 3/17 3/17 3/26 2/29 3.20 150.00
3 TG Southee 3/16 3/16 3/21 3/28 3/38 3.00 140.63
3 MA Starc 3/11 3/20 3/26 3/26 3/35 3.00 140.63
3 TA Boult 4/34 3/17 3/20 3/20 2/18 3.00 140.63
6 DW Steyn 4/17 3/15 3/22 2/10 2/20 2.80 131.25
6 JC Archer 4/33 3/13 3/23 2/20 2/21 2.80 131.25
8 K Rabada 3/20 3/39 3/48 2/22 2/23 2.60 121.88
8 LT Ngidi 3/26 3/30 3/31 2/6 2/20 2.60 121.88
8 B Muzarabani 4/17 3/14 2/22 2/26 2/33 2.60 121.88

BEST BOWLING BY ECO (NWT)


BBE

In this criteria, we have taken the top 5 bowling performances by Economy of a bowler against Non Weak Teams. Best Bowling By Economy (BBE) is the Relative Economy of the bowler in the 5 Inns. Only 12+ Balls performaces are counted in this criteria.

Criteria: Points For Economy In Top 5 Inns

RANK BOWLER 1 2 3 4 5 BBE RAT
TS AA Nortje 3.2/8 4.0/14 2.0/8 3.0/14 4.0/21 3.75 150.00
1 JR Hazlewood 2.0/8 4.0/16 4.0/16 4.0/16 4.0/16 4.00 140.51
2 TG Southee 4.0/16 4.0/16 4.0/16 4.0/18 4.0/20 4.33 129.98
3 K Rabada 4.0/15 4.0/16 4.0/18 4.0/20 4.0/22 4.38 128.48
4 MA Starc 3.1/11 4.0/17 4.0/17 4.0/20 4.0/21 4.64 121.26
5 DW Steyn 4.0/15 4.0/17 2.0/10 3.0/15 4.0/20 4.80 117.02
6 TA Boult 4.0/17 4.0/18 4.0/20 4.0/20 2.0/13 4.83 116.47
7 JC Archer 4.0/13 4.0/21 4.0/23 4.0/24 3.0/20 4.95 113.58
8 B Muzarabani 4.0/14 4.0/17 3.3/19 4.0/22 2.0/13 4.98 112.89
9 D Pretorius 3.0/11 4.0/17 3.0/17 2.0/13 3.0/21 5.00 112.38
10 LT Ngidi 4.0/15 4.0/26 3.0/20 2.0/14 4.0/29 5.66 99.24

NON ASIANS IN ASIA RATING


The NON ASIANS IN ASIA (UC) Rating is the addition of the points of all the above criteria. The rating is out of 1,000.

RANK BOWLER PRO CON ECO BBW BBE UC RAT
1 TG Southee 250.00 138.64 234.69 140.63 129.98 893.94
2 JR Hazlewood 172.62 177.21 242.03 150.00 140.51 882.38
3 B Muzarabani 226.19 167.29 234.42 121.88 112.89 862.66
4 TA Boult 154.76 200.00 246.72 140.63 116.47 858.57
5 MA Starc 232.14 146.29 217.12 140.63 121.26 857.44
6 D Pretorius 142.86 192.29 231.55 150.00 112.38 829.08
7 K Rabada 190.48 125.59 237.00 121.88 128.48 803.43
8 DW Steyn 125.00 176.60 238.38 131.25 117.02 788.25
9 LT Ngidi 154.76 162.27 236.13 121.88 99.24 774.28
10 JC Archer 178.57 119.89 213.97 131.25 113.58 757.26

TOP TEAMS


DECADE OF MAT 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
2000s PAK SA SL IND WI AUS NZ ENG
2010s IND SA PAK AUS ENG NZ SL WI
2020s IND ENG AUS PAK NZ SA BAN WI

NON WEAK TEAMS


DECADE OF MAT 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
2000s PAK SA SL IND WI AUS NZ ENG BAN
2010s IND SA PAK AUS ENG NZ SL WI BAN AFG
2020s IND ENG AUS PAK NZ SA BAN WI SL AFG US

*Most of our ratings are dynamic, and as new matches are played, the rating of earlier bowlers may change if current bowlers set new benchmarks.



Leave a Comment