Top 10 T20I Spin Bowlers Away From Home

Kindly switch to Landscape Mode for better viewing experience

Our T20 International (T20I) ratings take into account all matches from the first T20I match on February 17, 2005 till the below mentioned last update date. Brief explanation of the ratings is given before each section (Detailed Explanation). So, here are the Top 10 Spin bowlers in matches Away From Home in T20Is.

*Note: All T20I Ratings are updated till 2026-03-08

AW RATING

Points to note about AWAY Rating:-

  • U.A.E. and India are considered as Home for Afghanistan.
  • U.A.E. is also considered as a second home for Pakistan.
  • All Home and Away stats of Pakistani and Afghani bowlers are calculated accordingly.

THE CRITERIA


The AWAY Rating is divided into 5 main sections:-

CRITERIA STAT POINTS
Prolific Wickets Taken 200.00
Consistent Average 250.00
Economic Strike Rate 300.00
Best Bowling Top Inns (Wkts) 100.00
Economic Bowling Top Inns (Eco) 150.00
The Trend Setter (TS)

TS is the player which does the best in a criteria. The rating of all other players are calculated taking the TS as the benchmark. Know All About TS. Here is an example:-

  • TS Ave: 25.00; Player X Ave: 30.00; Section Points: 300.00
  • TS Points: 300.00(Max); Player X Points: TS Ave/Ave X 300 = 25.00/30.00 X 300 = 250.00
  • Ratings of all sections are calculated similarly with Ave being replaced by the Criteria Stat.
TT and NWT

Some sections consider performances only against the top teams (TT) and non weak teams (NWT). Here is some information:-

  • Win/Loss Ratio is used to determine TT and NWT.
  • They are calculated by decades.
  • A bowler's performace is counted in TT or NWT if it comes against that team in the specific decade.
  • Knock Out matches of T20 World Cup are also counted in TT.
  • TT & NWT may be found in the last section.

QUALIFICATION


Min Innings (TT) 15
Min Career Wkts 25

PROLIFIC


Criteria: Points For Wickets Taken

RANK BOWLER NAT FP LP MP INNS WKTS RAT
TS AU Rashid ENG 2009 2026 2017.5 98 116 200.00
1 AU Rashid ENG 2009 2026 2017.5 98 116 200.00
2 W Hasaranga SL 2019 2026 2022.5 61 100 172.41
3 A Zampa AUS 2016 2026 2021 78 98 168.97
4 Shahid Afridi PAK 2006 2025 2015.5 80 82 141.38
5 Rashid Khan AFG 2015 2026 2020.5 51 79 136.21
6 MJ Santner NZ 2015 2026 2020.5 71 72 124.14
7 Kuldeep Yadav IND 2017 2026 2021.5 33 68 117.24
8 T Shamsi SA 2017 2024 2020.5 41 64 110.34
9 Saeed Ajmal PAK 2009 2015 2012 45 59 101.72
10 GP Swann ENG 2008 2012 2010 22 34 58.62

CONSISTENT


R Ave

Relative Average (R Ave) is a more accurate type of average. Know How It Is Calculated. Briefly it takes into account:-

  • Strength of Opposition.
  • Venues at which a bowler has played.
  • Time Period in which he has been active

Criteria: Points For R Ave

Min Qualification For TS
Min Wickets 25
Min Wickets (TT) 15

Against All Teams

RANK BOWLER INNS RUNS WKTS AVE R AVE RAT
TS Kuldeep Yadav 33 790 68 11.62 12.73 100.00
1 Kuldeep Yadav 33 790 68 11.62 12.73 100.00
2 GP Swann 22 501 34 14.74 14.39 88.46
3 T Shamsi 41 978 64 15.28 15.66 81.28
4 W Hasaranga 61 1607 100 16.07 15.94 79.89
5 Rashid Khan 51 1195 79 15.13 18.17 70.05
6 Saeed Ajmal 45 1127 59 19.10 20.28 62.78
7 A Zampa 78 2115 98 21.58 21.32 59.72
8 AU Rashid 98 2642 116 22.78 22.20 57.36
9 MJ Santner 71 1788 72 24.83 24.39 52.21
10 Shahid Afridi 80 1962 82 23.93 26.37 48.27

Against Top Teams

RANK BOWLER INNS RUNS WKTS AVE R AVE RAT
TS Kuldeep Yadav 25 614 51 12.04 12.74 150.00
1 Kuldeep Yadav 25 614 51 12.04 12.74 150.00
2 GP Swann 21 479 32 14.97 14.47 131.98
3 T Shamsi 31 716 42 17.05 16.52 115.67
4 W Hasaranga 46 1294 73 17.73 16.53 115.59
5 Rashid Khan 16 374 21 17.81 18.29 104.42
6 Saeed Ajmal 35 913 47 19.43 19.50 97.95
7 MJ Santner 45 1194 48 24.88 22.25 85.86
8 AU Rashid 80 2186 90 24.29 22.85 83.59
9 A Zampa 64 1757 72 24.40 23.12 82.62
10 Shahid Afridi 54 1397 52 26.87 27.36 69.81

ECONOMIC


R ER

Relative Economy Rate (R ER) for bowlers is calculated using the same method as R Ave with average being replaced with ER.

Criteria: Points For R ER

Min Qualification For TS
Min Balls 400

Against All Teams

RANK BOWLER INNS BLS RUNS ER R ER RAT
TS DL Vettori 27 619 614 5.95 5.76 100.00
1 T Shamsi 41 867 978 6.77 5.99 96.19
2 Kuldeep Yadav 33 731 790 6.48 6.40 90.04
3 GP Swann 22 474 501 6.34 6.45 89.24
4 Rashid Khan 51 1146 1195 6.26 6.54 88.08
5 Saeed Ajmal 45 1011 1127 6.69 6.60 87.25
6 MJ Santner 71 1547 1788 6.93 6.61 87.08
7 W Hasaranga 61 1394 1607 6.92 6.64 86.71
8 Shahid Afridi 80 1742 1962 6.76 6.73 85.60
9 AU Rashid 98 2172 2642 7.30 6.92 83.28
10 A Zampa 78 1705 2115 7.44 7.05 81.68

Against Top Teams

RANK BOWLER INNS BLS RUNS ER R ER RAT
TS T Shamsi 31 639 716 6.72 5.71 200.00
1 T Shamsi 31 639 716 6.72 5.71 200.00
2 Kuldeep Yadav 25 577 614 6.38 6.19 184.39
3 Rashid Khan 16 360 374 6.23 6.26 182.38
4 Shahid Afridi 54 1220 1397 6.87 6.45 177.07
5 GP Swann 21 450 479 6.39 6.48 176.35
6 Saeed Ajmal 35 799 913 6.86 6.54 174.52
7 MJ Santner 45 967 1194 7.41 6.72 169.86
8 W Hasaranga 46 1046 1294 7.42 6.90 165.49
9 AU Rashid 80 1778 2186 7.38 6.91 165.37
10 A Zampa 64 1373 1757 7.68 7.14 159.98

BEST BOWLING BY WKTS (NWT)


BBW

In this criteria, we have taken the top 5 bowling performances by Wkts of a bowler against Non Weak Teams. Best Bowling By Wickets (BBW) is simply the total wickets taken in the 5 innings divided by 5.

Criteria: Points For Wkts Taken In Top 5 Inns

RANK BOWLER 1 2 3 4 5 BBW RAT
TS Kuldeep Yadav 5/17 5/24 4/30 3/12 3/18 4.00 100.00
1 Kuldeep Yadav 5/17 5/24 4/30 3/12 3/18 4.00 100.00
2 A Zampa 5/19 4/24 4/34 3/16 3/16 3.80 95.00
3 T Shamsi 5/24 4/25 3/6 3/17 3/20 3.60 90.00
4 Saeed Ajmal 4/26 4/30 3/17 3/18 3/26 3.40 85.00
4 AU Rashid 4/2 4/32 3/11 3/19 3/32 3.40 85.00
6 MJ Santner 4/11 3/12 3/15 3/19 3/26 3.20 80.00
7 Rashid Khan 4/17 4/23 3/26 2/23 2/27 3.00 75.00
7 W Hasaranga 3/12 3/13 3/17 3/20 3/21 3.00 75.00
9 Shahid Afridi 4/14 3/18 3/28 2/16 2/17 2.80 70.00
10 GP Swann 3/13 3/14 3/24 2/17 2/18 2.60 65.00

BEST BOWLING BY ECO (NWT)


BBE

In this criteria, we have taken the top 5 bowling performances by Economy of a bowler against Non Weak Teams. Best Bowling By Economy (BBE) is the Relative Economy of the bowler in the 5 Inns. Only 12+ Balls performaces are counted in this criteria.

Criteria: Points For Economy In Top 5 Inns

RANK BOWLER 1 2 3 4 5 BBE RAT
TS Mohammad Hafeez 4.0/6 2.0/4 4.0/9 4.0/11 3.0/11 2.38 150.00
1 AU Rashid 2.2/2 4.0/11 4.0/11 4.0/13 4.0/14 2.64 135.64
2 MJ Santner 4.0/11 4.0/11 4.0/12 4.0/14 4.0/15 3.00 119.01
3 T Shamsi 4.0/11 4.0/13 4.0/13 4.0/16 4.0/16 3.05 117.14
4 W Hasaranga 4.0/12 4.0/12 4.0/13 4.0/13 4.0/17 3.22 111.14
5 A Zampa 4.0/12 3.0/10 2.3/9 4.0/16 4.0/19 3.57 100.07
6 Shahid Afridi 4.0/14 4.0/15 4.0/15 4.0/16 4.0/17 3.83 93.28
7 GP Swann 4.0/13 4.0/14 4.0/17 4.0/17 4.0/17 3.97 90.08
8 Kuldeep Yadav 4.0/12 4.0/18 4.0/18 4.0/18 3.0/14 4.15 86.08
9 Rashid Khan 4.0/14 4.0/15 4.0/17 4.0/17 3.0/14 4.24 84.41
10 Saeed Ajmal 4.0/17 3.0/13 3.1/14 4.0/18 4.0/18 4.35 82.27

AWAY RATING


The AWAY (AW) Rating is the addition of the points of all the above criteria. The rating is out of 1,000.

RANK BOWLER PRO CON ECO BBW BBE AW RAT
1 Kuldeep Yadav 117.24 250.00 274.43 100.00 86.08 827.76
2 T Shamsi 110.34 196.95 296.19 90.00 117.14 810.62
3 AU Rashid 200.00 140.95 248.65 85.00 135.64 810.24
4 W Hasaranga 172.41 195.48 252.20 75.00 111.14 806.23
5 A Zampa 168.97 142.35 241.65 95.00 100.07 748.03
6 Rashid Khan 136.21 174.48 270.45 75.00 84.41 740.55
7 MJ Santner 124.14 138.07 256.94 80.00 119.01 718.16
8 GP Swann 58.62 220.44 265.59 65.00 90.08 699.72
9 Saeed Ajmal 101.72 160.73 261.77 85.00 82.27 691.49
10 Shahid Afridi 141.38 118.09 262.67 70.00 93.28 685.41

TOP TEAMS


DECADE OF MAT 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8
2000s PAK SA SL IND WI AUS NZ ENG
2010s IND SA PAK AUS ENG NZ SL WI
2020s IND ENG AUS PAK NZ SA BAN WI

NON WEAK TEAMS


DECADE OF MAT 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11
2000s PAK SA SL IND WI AUS NZ ENG BAN
2010s IND SA PAK AUS ENG NZ SL WI BAN AFG
2020s IND ENG AUS PAK NZ SA BAN WI SL AFG US

*Most of our ratings are dynamic, and as new matches are played, the rating of earlier bowlers may change if current bowlers set new benchmarks.



Leave a Comment