Top 10 Current Fast Bowlers In ODI Cricket

Kindly switch to Landscape Mode for better viewing experience

Our One Day International (ODI) ratings take into account all matches from the first ODI match on January 5, 1971 till the below mentioned last update date. Most of our ratings are dynamic, and as new matches are played, the rating of earlier bowlers may change if current bowlers set new benchmarks. Brief explanation of the ratings is given before each section (Detailed Explanation). So, here are the Top 10 Fast bowlers in matches in last 5 years in ODIs.

*Note: All ODI Ratings are updated till 2025-09-15

CUR RATING

Points to note about CURRENT Rating:-

  • This rating takes into account only matches played in 5 years.
  • Only bowlers active till at least 2024 are considered in this rating.

THE CRITERIA


The CURRENT Rating is divided into 5 main sections:-

CRITERIA STAT POINTS
Prolific Wickets Taken 200.00
Consistent Average 300.00
Economic Strike Rate 300.00
Best Bowling Top Inns (Wkts) 100.00
Economic Bowling Top Inns (Eco) 100.00
The Trend Setter (TS)

TS is the player which does the best in a criteria. The rating of all other players are calculated taking the TS as the benchmark. Know All About TS. Here is an example:-

  • TS Ave: 25.00; Player X Ave: 30.00; Section Points: 300.00
  • TS Points: 300.00(Max); Player X Points: TS Ave/Ave X 300 = 25.00/30.00 X 300 = 250.00
  • Ratings of all sections are calculated similarly with Ave being replaced by the Criteria Stat.
TT and NWT

Some sections consider performances only against the top teams (TT) and non weak teams (NWT). Here is some information:-

  • Win/Loss Ratio is used to determine TT and NWT.
  • They are calculated by decades.
  • A bowler's performace is counted in TT or NWT if it comes against that team in the specific decade.
  • Knock Out and Super Six matches of ODI World Cup are also counted.
  • TT & NWT may be found in the last section.

QUALIFICATION


Min Innings (TT) 10
Min Career Wkts 50

PROLIFIC


Criteria: Points For Wickets Taken

RANK BOWLER NAT INNS WKTS RAT
TS Haris Rauf PAK 48 87 200.00
1 Haris Rauf PAK 48 87 200.00
2 Shaheen Shah Afridi PAK 44 86 197.70
3 AS Joseph WI 52 85 195.40
4 MJ Henry NZ 39 73 167.82
5 Taskin Ahmed BAN 48 72 165.52
6 M Siraj IND 42 71 163.22
7 Mohammed Shami IND 31 62 142.53
8 MA Starc AUS 33 61 140.23
9 JR Hazlewood AUS 42 57 131.03
10 JC Archer ENG 17 32 73.56

CONSISTENT


R Ave

Relative Average (R Ave) is a more accurate type of average. Know How It Is Calculated. Briefly it takes into account:-

  • Strength of Opposition.
  • Venues at which a bowler has played.
  • Time Period in which he has been active

Criteria: Points For R Ave

Min Qualification For TS
Min Wickets 25
Min Wickets (TT) 15

Against All Teams

RANK BOWLER INNS RUNS WKTS AVE R AVE RAT
TS Mohammed Shami 31 1294 62 20.87 21.39 150.00
1 Mohammed Shami 31 1294 62 20.87 21.39 150.00
2 MJ Henry 39 1657 73 22.70 21.56 148.81
3 JC Archer 17 789 32 24.66 22.82 140.63
4 M Siraj 42 1631 71 22.97 24.23 132.44
5 Shaheen Shah Afridi 44 2207 86 25.66 24.84 129.16
6 MA Starc 33 1596 61 26.16 24.87 129.04
7 AS Joseph 52 2337 85 27.49 25.65 125.10
8 Haris Rauf 48 2296 87 26.39 26.11 122.90
9 Taskin Ahmed 48 2033 72 28.24 28.07 114.31
10 JR Hazlewood 42 1732 57 30.39 28.16 113.93

Against Top Teams

RANK BOWLER INNS RUNS WKTS AVE R AVE RAT
TS JC Archer 13 610 28 21.79 20.10 150.00
1 JC Archer 13 610 28 21.79 20.10 150.00
2 Mohammed Shami 23 981 51 19.24 20.10 150.00
3 MJ Henry 28 1160 51 22.75 21.37 141.10
4 M Siraj 29 1104 53 20.83 21.87 137.89
5 Shaheen Shah Afridi 30 1620 65 24.92 23.56 127.94
6 AS Joseph 32 1387 52 26.67 24.45 123.32
7 MA Starc 18 915 31 29.52 26.31 114.58
8 Taskin Ahmed 24 1111 38 29.24 27.38 110.10
9 Haris Rauf 32 1621 55 29.47 28.01 107.62
10 JR Hazlewood 27 1239 34 36.44 31.92 94.46

ECONOMIC


R ER

Relative Economy Rate (R ER) for bowlers is calculated using the same method as R Ave with average being replaced with ER.

Criteria: Points For R ER

Min Qualification For TS
Min Balls 500

Against All Teams

RANK BOWLER INNS BLS RUNS ER R ER RAT
TS JR Hazlewood 42 2129 1732 4.88 3.80 150.00
1 JR Hazlewood 42 2129 1732 4.88 3.80 150.00
2 MJ Henry 39 2031 1657 4.90 3.87 147.54
3 M Siraj 42 1915 1631 5.11 3.97 143.82
4 Taskin Ahmed 48 2429 2033 5.02 4.02 141.89
5 Mohammed Shami 31 1396 1294 5.56 4.15 137.46
6 JC Archer 17 864 789 5.48 4.20 135.82
7 AS Joseph 52 2660 2337 5.27 4.25 134.34
8 MA Starc 33 1684 1596 5.69 4.47 127.59
9 Shaheen Shah Afridi 44 2268 2207 5.84 4.52 126.35
10 Haris Rauf 48 2336 2296 5.90 4.60 124.08

Against Top Teams

RANK BOWLER INNS BLS RUNS ER R ER RAT
TS MJ Henry 28 1461 1160 4.76 3.75 150.00
1 MJ Henry 28 1461 1160 4.76 3.75 150.00
2 M Siraj 29 1289 1104 5.14 3.89 144.71
3 JR Hazlewood 27 1432 1239 5.19 3.99 141.20
4 AS Joseph 32 1615 1387 5.15 4.14 135.88
5 JC Archer 13 666 610 5.50 4.17 135.00
6 Mohammed Shami 23 1037 981 5.68 4.20 133.93
7 Taskin Ahmed 24 1236 1111 5.39 4.22 133.48
8 MA Starc 18 940 915 5.84 4.52 124.48
9 Haris Rauf 32 1630 1621 5.97 4.55 123.80
10 Shaheen Shah Afridi 30 1628 1620 5.97 4.55 123.74

BEST BOWLING BY WKTS (NWT)


BBW

In this criteria, we have taken the top 5 bowling performances by Wkts of a bowler. Best Bowling By Wickets (BBW) is simply the total wickets taken in the 5 innings divided by 5.

Criteria: Points For Wkts Taken In Top 5 Inns

RANK BOWLER 1 2 3 4 5 BBW RAT
TS Mohammed Shami 7/57 5/18 5/51 5/53 5/54 5.40 100.00
1 Mohammed Shami 7/57 5/18 5/51 5/53 5/54 5.40 100.00
2 Haris Rauf 5/18 5/29 4/19 4/65 4/77 4.40 81.48
3 Taskin Ahmed 5/35 4/44 4/46 4/47 4/53 4.20 77.78
3 Shaheen Shah Afridi 5/54 4/35 4/47 4/51 4/63 4.20 77.78
5 MA Starc 5/48 5/53 4/47 3/26 3/33 4.00 74.07
5 MJ Henry 5/42 4/19 4/27 4/55 3/14 4.00 74.07
5 M Siraj 6/21 4/32 4/46 3/16 3/29 4.00 74.07
5 JC Archer 6/40 4/18 4/62 3/35 3/64 4.00 74.07
9 AS Joseph 4/31 3/36 3/39 3/50 3/53 3.20 59.26
10 JR Hazlewood 3/11 3/31 3/38 3/41 3/43 3.00 55.56

BEST BOWLING BY ECO (NWT)


BBE

In this criteria, we have taken the top 5 bowling performances by Economy of a bowler. Best Bowling By Economy (BBE) is the Relative Economy of the bowler in the 5 Inns. Only 30+ Balls performaces are counted in this criteria.

Criteria: Points For Economy In Top 5 Inns

RANK BOWLER 1 2 3 4 5 BBE RAT
TS JR Hazlewood 8.0/12 6.0/11 6.0/11 8.0/18 7.0/21 1.63 100.00
1 JR Hazlewood 8.0/12 6.0/11 6.0/11 8.0/18 7.0/21 1.63 100.00
2 MJ Henry 10.0/14 10.0/19 6.0/12 10.0/27 9.0/26 1.72 94.47
3 M Siraj 6.0/10 7.0/16 7.0/21 10.0/32 10.0/32 2.15 75.45
4 Mohammed Shami 6.0/17 6.0/18 7.0/22 6.0/20 5.0/18 2.36 68.77
5 MA Starc 7.0/12 10.0/26 10.0/33 10.0/34 8.0/31 2.38 68.38
6 AS Joseph 8.0/17 10.0/25 10.0/31 10.0/33 10.0/36 2.38 68.19
7 JC Archer 5.0/8 9.0/18 10.0/37 8.5/35 5.0/21 2.41 67.40
8 Taskin Ahmed 8.2/23 9.0/26 10.0/31 8.0/25 8.0/27 2.44 66.64
9 Shaheen Shah Afridi 9.0/23 9.4/31 8.0/26 10.0/35 8.5/32 2.50 65.05
10 Haris Rauf 6.2/18 6.0/19 7.0/24 8.0/29 6.2/23 2.62 62.11

CURRENT RATING


The CURRENT (CUR) Rating is the addition of the points of all the above criteria. The rating is out of 1,000.

RANK BOWLER PRO CON ECO BBW BBE CUR RAT
1 MJ Henry 167.82 289.92 297.54 74.07 94.47 923.82
2 Mohammed Shami 142.53 300.00 271.39 100.00 68.77 882.69
3 M Siraj 163.22 270.33 288.53 74.07 75.45 871.60
4 Shaheen Shah Afridi 197.70 257.10 250.09 77.78 65.05 847.71
5 AS Joseph 195.40 248.42 270.21 59.26 68.19 841.49
6 Haris Rauf 200.00 230.52 247.89 81.48 62.11 821.99
7 Taskin Ahmed 165.52 224.41 275.37 77.78 66.64 809.71
8 JR Hazlewood 131.03 208.39 291.20 55.56 100.00 786.18
9 MA Starc 140.23 243.62 252.06 74.07 68.38 778.38
10 JC Archer 73.56 290.63 270.82 74.07 67.40 776.49

TOP TEAMS


DECADE OF MAT 1 2 3 4 5 6 7
1970s WI ENG AUS NZ PAK
1980s WI ENG AUS PAK IND NZ
1990s SA AUS PAK WI IND SL
2000s AUS SA SL PAK IND NZ ENG
2010s IND SA AUS ENG NZ PAK SL
2020s IND NZ SL AUS PAK SA BAN

NON WEAK TEAMS


DECADE OF MAT 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1970s WI ENG AUS NZ PAK SL IND
1980s WI ENG AUS PAK IND NZ SL ZIM
1990s SA AUS PAK WI IND SL ENG NZ ZIM
2000s AUS SA SL PAK IND NZ ENG WI BAN
2010s IND SA AUS ENG NZ PAK SL BAN WI
2020s IND NZ SL AUS PAK SA BAN ENG WI AFG


Leave a Comment